As it turns out you, me ol' Sino chinas (did you see what I did there? If you’re from London or are familiar with Cockney rhyming slang you’ll understand), have gone the same way the rest of the world has gone for the last seventy or eighty years. Down the Anglicised rabbit-hole. And with no chance of leaving that mad hatter’s party. You can have a stab at answering the riddle “why is a raven like a writing desk?” but you will nevar (sic) be able to come up with the goods. Because, guess what, they will be in English.
According to a recent article in The Economist Chinese language purists are trying to keep the evil influence of the English lexicon out. Ha, good luck with that! Funny, isn’t it? Mao exterminated millions through famine and his so-called “cultural” revolution (very little if anything of the former but plenty of the latter). Last week we commemorated the 25th anniversary of the massacre in Tiannamen Square and the hundreds, if not thousands, who were murdered there. All these events and the way they look to the outside world should worry the business-conscious, modern China more and yet the threat to the socialist state comes, not from reform-minded students, but from a Germanic language whose most famous icon is a 16th century-born playwright, poet and actor. Even Shakespeare couldn’t have made it up.
The irony of the tirade in China's state-run People’s
Daily against words such as “MBA”, “CEO” and “iPhone”, the examples given
in the article, is that it fails to take into account the rapid economic growth
China has undertaken in the last ten or twelve years and its consequences. This
development has come at a cost. The more a country opens itself up to investment
(whether it is state-sponsored capitalism or sweatshops) the bigger the risk of
its losing some aspects of its culture. I know that from my own experience. Back
when I used to live in Cuba there were people who adopted an accent that was half
Cuban, half American just to impress and sound more knowledgeable, worldly and important.
In reality they sounded like fakes, because they were fakes. The dichotomy in
the Chinese situation is that you have a country competing for markets with the
USA and Europe and yet they think that they can achieve this by coming up with
their Sinified version of Twitter (which is blocked in China anyway).Let’s say it again just in case it didn’t sink in first time around. English as we know it and speak it (especially the oral bit) won’t be our lingua franca forever. Eventually either another language will take over (I’m of the opinion it will be Spanish because of the large Latin population in the States and the fact that it will be the official language of the country in fifteen to twenty years) or English will develop into unrecognisable (to us now) variants depending on which country you are. Globlish is a good example of this. That means that no matter how much the Chinese newspaper People’s Daily rails against the pernicious influence of the evil empire’s lexicon, people in China, chiefly young people, will continue to use the English term “NBA” instead of wrecking their brains trying to come up with a Chinese equivalent. In the meantime they could do something constructive and attempt to translate and answer the riddle posed above: “why is a raven like a writing desk?”
© 2014
Photo taken from The Economist
Next Post: “Sunday Mornings: Coffee, Reflections and Music”, to be published on Sunday 15th June at 10am (GMT)
