A defining moment
of the Viking Age came in 1066 at the village of Stamford Bridge. It was here
where King Harold Godwinson defeated invading Norwegian forces under the
command of King Harald Hardrada and Tostig Godwinson, Harold’s brother.
This Stamford
Bridge, however, was, and still is, in Yorkshire, north of England. Nothing to
do with the one in SW6, London; the finish line of my three-stadium bike-tour. And
yet, I saw parallels between the two places.
For the last
thirteen years there has been a battle in English football, specifically in the
top division, namely, the Premier League. This conflict has gone beyond the
terraces. It is more a financial matter than a fan-driven one. It has pitted
owners versus cash-strapped supporters. It has awakened followers, football-refuseniks
and neutrals to the reality of modern soccer. At the heart of this issue is the
sport itself, what it used to be and what it has become.
In the summer of
2003, Roman Abramovich, Russian billionaire, arrived at Stamford Bridge,
southwestern London, to take over Chelsea Football Club. On doing this he
changed the face of the sport forever. In that first summer, Chelsea spent
£110m on 13 players. This set the tone for the various takeovers that would
happen in subsequent years: Manchester City, Manchester united and Liverpool
Football Club are all now foreign-owned. The latter, with its well-proven pedigree
in the sport,
was bought by the Fenway Sports Group. Anyone familiar with baseball will recognise
the first word in that company’s name. It is the name of the Boston Red
Sox's stadium.
As I stood outside
CFC's home ground, giving both my bike and myself a much-needed rest, I could not
help thinking that the only times I had been inside “The Bridge” (as we fans
call it) had been to purchase merchandise in its shop or as participant in events held on its premises. I had never been to a match. The ticket price was
too high for me. In this bloodless battle over who bought which club I could
see only one casualty: the loyal football fan.
In the hot midday
sun, I also reflected on how this tug-of-war was not limited just to the
Premier League. I had just cycled from one end of the city to the other. 34.4 miles in three hours, fifty minutes and 25 seconds. Along the
way I had seen deprivation, regeneration-linked gentrification, magical and
practical urbanisation and new-money invasion. The well-designed housing estates
on the almost-traffic-free Grosvenor Road in Pimlico, contrasted with the 60s-built, ordinary-looking Tottenham mid-rises. In the minimalist properties in SW3 I imagined most notes were scribbled using the Cyrillic alphabet these days. Council properties
in East London were being flogged off in the Far East at plush fairs to
prospective buyers who never had any intention of relocating to Britain. It was
not just football where the playing field had changed for the worse. Unlike in
1066 the battle was not between an invading force and a fearless home-grown
army but between unbridled free-market power and national sovereignty. For all
that the rightwing press railed against “foreign welfare scroungers”, they were letting
off the hook the tycoons whose tax contributions to the Exchequer were, at
most, risible. Some of them lived in the white doll-looking houses past which I
had just cycled.
I had conceived the
idea of the three-stadium bike-tour based on the fact that Tottenham Hotspurs,
my starting point, had not won the league since 1961. Arsenal’s Emirates, my
next stop, had not tasted success in England’s elite football competition for eleven
years, whereas Chelsea, at whose stadium I was now, had won four Premier League
titles since Abramovich's takeover. From former to current glories. Irony of ironies. Look at the table now
and see who is doing better and who is doing worse. During my journey, though, I
realised that I was also taking the lid off another London. One that had eluded
me all these years, either because I was just another commuter going from A to
B, or because I was not looking at the whole picture. Stamford Bridge gave me
that final – but still only temporary – piece of the puzzle. Roman’s pet
project had unwittingly become a synecdoche, not just for football but also for
what was happening in London, property-wise, investment-wise, finances-wise. The
part that was being used for the whole. Suddenly, Stamford Bridge, Yorkshire and
its SW6 cousin were no longer just two places in England, separated by hundreds
of miles, but two conflict zones. The former, steeped in history, the latter’s outcome, yet to be known.
© 2016
Next Post: “Living
in a Multilingual World”, to be published on Tuesday 23rd February
at 6pm (GMT)
It's a fact that nothing, certainly not ancient cities like London, stay the same. I've enjoyed your tour of London. Thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeleteGreat stuff, and very informative indeed.
ReplyDeleteAnd that conflict still results in bloodshed. Arguably less, but blood is spilt just the same.
ReplyDeleteThat "new" money sure finds a way to sweep in and try and get the win.
ReplyDeleteHistory is the story of absurdity, and it is fascinating to wonder what the story of England would be had Harold Godwinson and his Anglo-Saxon army been defeated by (rather than defeating) Norsemen in the form of Norwegians at the Battle of Stamford Bridge in September 1066, rather than by Norsemen in the form of Normans under William the Pig (whoops, William the Conqueror) at the Battle of Hastings in October 1066. But, that would be another story.
ReplyDeleteThe way you have woven the past the present is imaginative and creative, CiL. Actually, I think the methods and the weapons of warfare essentially are unchanged from then to now. There always have been those who fought by force of arms and those who fought by stealth and cunning and big bankrolls.
A late addition about an unrelated topic: Reading my Sunday newspaper (the archaic, but proper way -- ink on paper), I noticed the residents of England will be voting in June whether or not to maintain membership in the European Union. I hope you will be writing a post or two about this dilemma between now and the vote, CiL.
DeleteThis, along with the Mideast wars and refugees, the Russian aggressions, the Chinese expansions, the U.S. elections .... well, it is fascinating. The world is about to be turned upside down again, it would seem.
On Europe, my guess is a good as yours. Sometimes it pays to be a foreign-born British citizen! :-) I do have an opinion, of course, but I need to mull it over. Too many rushed decisions are being made right now.
DeleteGreetings from London.
Wonderful parallels you draw between the Vikings and football!
ReplyDeleteI love the concept of the bike tour inspiring these posts. You make several sharp observations along the way. Over here it seems like every inch of Manhattan is being turned into luxury apartments and I suspect the money is coming from outside the US.
ReplyDeleteLondon is a town I still have to visit :)
ReplyDeleteYour comments on your journey are of the book-reading variety. Hope you get round to that. It is surprising how little I know of London, even so I love the place.
ReplyDeleteI noticed Fram Actual's request that you report on the dilemma we face in this country... hope you will write about it.
The dilemma being who's the bigger one one, David or Boris? Sorry for the vulgar language but vulgarity is what has dominated this European "debate". I will vote, for sure, but I still have to think things through and separate the wheat from the chaff. And there's plenty of both at the moment.
DeleteGreetings from London.
Another brilliant post, CiL...and I like the parallels you've drawn between the Vikings and football too!
ReplyDeleteI think the past is ever present really...battles being fought everyday, either by aggressive force or stealth and subterfuge.
Not much has changed over the centuries, has it?
Have a great day! :)